By late 2025, tokenized private credit had become the largest non-Treasury category in the real-world asset market. Data from rwa.xyz put active on-chain private credit loans at roughly $18.9 billion as of mid-November 2025, with cumulative originations of about $33.66 billion since the first pools launched. That makes private credit second only to tokenized Treasuries among real-world assets that have moved onto a blockchain, and the fastest-growing of the credit-style categories.
Those numbers get cited often, usually as evidence that tokenization has arrived for private debt. They are real, but they hide a distinction that matters more than the headline. Most of that $18.9 billion is recorded on a blockchain. Much less of it is distributed as a transferable token that an investor actually holds. Understanding the gap is the difference between knowing the market and being sold a version of it.
Represented Versus Distributed
There are two very different things people mean when they say a loan is "on-chain."
The first is representation. A lender keeps its book of loans, and writes a record of each one to a blockchain for operational reasons: reconciliation, servicing, reporting, and a shared source of truth between counterparties. The asset itself is not packaged as a token that trades. The blockchain is a better database, not a distribution channel.
The second is distribution. A loan or a fund interest is issued as a token that an investor holds directly, that can settle peer to peer, and whose ownership lives on the ledger rather than in a transfer agent's spreadsheet. This is what most people picture when they hear "tokenized credit," and it is the smaller share of the market.
The split is stark. One analysis of the roughly $19.3 billion in active loans tracked by rwa.xyz found that only about 12 percent was held in transferable tokenized form, with distributed value closer to $5 billion as of March 2026. The rest was represented for record-keeping. A single platform explains most of the concentration: Figure, which tokenizes home-equity lines of credit on the Provenance blockchain, accounts for roughly 73 percent of the category by volume but uses the chain mainly as a system of record rather than a venue for distributing transferable tokens.
This is not a criticism of Figure. Using a blockchain to run a large lending operation more efficiently is a legitimate and valuable use. But it means the topline number describes two different businesses stacked on top of each other, and an investor needs to know which one a given product belongs to.
The Distributable Platforms
The platforms that issue private credit as transferable tokens are smaller, and they tell a more textured story.
Maple Finance is among the better known. It manages on the order of $780 million in active loans, lending primarily to crypto-native trading firms and fintech companies with verifiable balance sheets. Centrifuge builds tokenization infrastructure for a broader range of assets and had originated more than $1.1 billion in active loans by March 2026. Goldfinch took a different route, focusing on private business lending in emerging markets, where the credit profile and the default expectations look like emerging-market lending rather than crypto trading. Tradable, built on ZKsync Era in partnership with Victory Park Capital, had tokenized over $2 billion in assets by mid-2025.
These platforms differ in borrower type, geography, and structure, but they share the property that matters for this discussion: the token is the instrument, not just a mirror of one.
The Institutional Funds Arrive
The more consequential shift in the last two years has been the entry of established asset managers, who tokenize access to existing credit funds rather than originating loans on-chain.
The clearest example is Apollo. In January 2025, Apollo and Securitize launched the Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund, known as ACRED, a tokenized feeder into Apollo's diversified global credit strategy spanning corporate direct lending, asset-backed lending, and structured credit. ACRED launched across multiple networks including Ethereum, Solana, Avalanche, Aptos, Polygon, and Ink, used Wormhole to move tokens between them, and added the Sei network in February 2026. It drew more than $100 million from investors in its early months. Hamilton Lane has tokenized credit fund access through Securitize as well, expanding a senior credit strategy from Polygon onto Ethereum and Optimism.
The significance is less about the dollar amounts, which are still small relative to the funds themselves, and more about who is participating. When Apollo and Hamilton Lane put fund interests on a public chain, the question stops being whether institutional private credit will tokenize and becomes how, on what rails, and with what protections.
Why the Distinction Decides the Value
For a TradFi credit investor, the represented-versus-distributed split is not a technicality. It determines what the token does for you.
If a loan is merely represented on-chain by its originator, the investor's claim still runs entirely through that originator's systems and legal structure. The blockchain record is only as trustworthy as the party writing to it, and it can be amended, reconciled, or contradicted by the operator's own books. The investor has a database entry, not independent settlement.
If a fund interest is distributed as a token that settles on a public ledger, the ownership record exists independently of any single operator, and it can be transferred and verified without asking the issuer's permission. That is the property that makes tokenization more than a faster spreadsheet. It is also the property that depends most heavily on the chain underneath: its finality, its auditability, and its independence from any one operator.
That is where this series is headed. The market is large and growing, but the part of it that delivers the actual benefits of tokenization is the part where the token is the asset and the settlement layer can be trusted on its own terms. The next article looks at the harder questions that follow once an investor holds such a token: custody, what happens in a default, and why the audit trail is worth more than the speed.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.
Mintlayer's I1 is a family of regulated funds that hold income-producing real-world assets and distribute the cash flow to token holders, settled on Bitcoin-native infrastructure. Learn more →
